Skip to Main Content
Plans and activities
Toolkit
Organising and deciding Power and leadership

How to design a community grants programme

Reflections and tips from four Big Local areas

When people want to make lasting change happen in their local community, they often need money to achieve their vision. Community grants can be used to fund new ideas or projects,
help establish groups and support activities that respond to community needs.

Sometimes known as community pots or community chests, community grants are relatively small amounts of money (often in the hundreds or thousands of pounds, rather than millions) that are distributed to local people to do great things. However, distributing money is harder than it sounds.

That’s why we’ve created this toolkit, to share tips and ideas on designing or refreshing a community grants programme. This toolkit can help you:

  • explore how community grants could support the change you want to make
  • design an accessible application process
  • define how you will decide which projects to fund
  • explore how much risk you are willing to take
  • attract applications from groups you haven’t engaged with yet
  • give out grants fairly
  • review your community grants programme to check it fits with
    your priorities.

It’s based on an action research project carried out by the Institute for Voluntary Action Research (IVAR) with four Big Local partnerships – Hateley Cross, Kingsbrook and Cauldwell, Rastrick, and Roseworth. The research supported these four partnerships to improve their grant-making approaches and share their learnings.

Download toolkit

 

Section 1: What difference do you want your grants to make?

The hardest part about grant-making is that there is never enough money to support the many good causes and projects we’d all love to deliver. So, it’s really important for your grants committee to set out why you want to give out community grants. Being specific will make it easier for you to make decisions and ensure you back projects that address local issues

Three ways to align your grants programme with your aims
Questions to define the purpose of your grants
Support to define your grant purpose
Case study: Reviewing and refining the focus of community grants in Kingsbrook and Cauldwell

Section 2: How to understand local issues and reach people in need of support

Distributing community grants is a privilege and an opportunity to make lasting change in your local area. To have the most impact, it’s important to have a deep understanding of local needs; which organisations, projects or activities are already addressing them; and which groups will most benefit from your grants.

Carrying out a needs assessment
Reaching out to people in need of support
Support to engage your community
Case study 1: Mapping to understand needs in Hateley Cross
Case study 2: Attracting applicants in Rastrick
Questions to market your programme
Support to market your community grants programme

Section 3: How to take measured risks while grant-making

When you assess applications and award grants, you’re making judgements that balance risks and benefits. Community grants often fund new ideas or help establish new groups who may not have a track record. This could make them more likely to fail or encounter obstacles. But that doesn’t mean they’re not worth funding.

Indeed, community grants are often about more than just supporting activities and projects. They’re a way to build the confidence and skills of residents to deliver community activities and access further support and funding, as they did in Rastrick Big Local.

Case study: Upskilling through the application process in Rastrick
Questions to define your approach to risk in grant-making
Support to develop a risk framework

Section 4: How to attract and support applicants and funded groups

It can be overwhelming for residents to apply for funding and spend a grant as planned. That’s why providing some support to applicants and funded groups is essential to making community grants accessible to people who may never have applied for a grant or run a project before.

This could include:

  1. Outreach work that encourages applications
    For example, Roseworth Big Local planned to speak directly with older people at bingo events, lunch clubs and a knitting group, because they may not access information online.
  2. Help with writing applications
    For example, in Rastrick, potential applicants are encouraged to have a conversation with partnership members or their Big Local worker before submitting a formal application, to help them develop their idea, or to get some guidance on how to write an application.
  3. Hosting an online webinar or in-person Q&A
    To present the community grant application process to potential applicants.
  4. Guidance about how to run a project or set up a group or organisation for community benefit
    For example, signposting to the local Council for Voluntary Service (CVS).
  5. Signposting and support to apply for further funding
    For example, in Radstock and Westfield, community grants are sometimes used to assist groups to create plans that will help them access funds for capital projects.

This is an ex-coal mining community, so there are lots of community clubs and social clubs. Sometimes we use small grants to support these groups with business plans for larger projects, so they can make applications to bigger pots of funding.”
Big Local chair

Questions to assess your applicant outreach and support
Support to be a fair and flexible funder

Section 5: How to design a simple and accessible application process

Community grants programmes need simple and accessible processes to support residents to apply. Applications that require lots of information will take too much time to fill out and put people off, especially first-time applicants.

To streamline your application process, try to:

  1. Only include essential questions
    that you need to carry out due diligence and make sure the funding is used appropriately. Strip out requests for information that you don’t use.
  2. Use simple English
    and remove acronyms. Check out the guides from the Plain English Campaign.
  3. Accept applications in a range of formats
    For example video applications, or hold events for residents to pitch their ideas.
  4. Set and publish clear expectations
    for potential applicants about what the grants can be used for. For example, applications need to be in line with your Big Local Plan.
  5. Set and publish realistic and transparent timescales
    for reviewing applications and communicating grant decisions. Groups are often waiting on your decision to move ahead with their plans.
  6. Provide support to new applicants
    to develop their ideas, but be clear at which stage you are giving them advice and when you are assessing them.
  7. Invite some groups to test out the application process
    once it is designed.
  8. Provide feedback on unsuccessful applications
    and publish details of what has been funded on your website or social media.
Questions to create an accessible application process
Support to make your application accessible and inclusive

Section 6: How to make transparent and fair decisions

Sometimes conflicts and difficulties can arise when one group holds, and is responsible for distributing, funding. For example, some unsuccessful applicants may question decisions, especially if grants have been awarded to community members that are part of the grants committee. Making sure the way you make decisions is fair and transparent can help you avoid or navigate these types of problems if they arise.

Having an accessible application process is one step towards more transparent decision-making, but it could be helpful to look at how your organisation works. For example:

  1. Develop your team’s grants and application management skills, so they can make decisions confidently and explain the process should someone want more information.
  2. Help your team be clear about the purpose of grants,
    including what priorities to support (for example, health and wellbeing, young people). This will lead to more transparency and fairness because decision-making is not based on personal preferences and the rationale can be explained.
  3. Agree how to respond to conflicts of interest
    that arise when community members are both applying for and assessing community grants. Some Big Local areas who took part in the research ask members who are also applicants to step out of decision-making meetings; others defer difficult decisions to an independent partner.
  4. Invite different people from the community into the decision-making process,
    to broaden the diversity of the group and share the decision-making, like they did in Radstock and Westfield Big Local.
Participatory decision-making in Radstock and Westfield
Questions for grant-making
Support to upskill your team in grant-making

Section 7: How to measure change meaningfully

Measuring change or ‘monitoring and reporting’ helps you find out what is going well, what hasn’t gone as planned and how things could be improved. It’s important to balance what you need as a funder with what is realistic to expect of the groups and residents you want to fund.

Some useful approaches to collecting information and feedback include:

  1. Be clear from the beginning
    that those receiving community grant funds will be asked to provide updates about how the funded project or activity is going. Agree on how they will do this, what information you would like to know and when or how often they will report back.
  2. Only ask for information that will be used
    and let funded partners know how it will be used.
  3. Allow funded partners to choose how to provide feedback
    and agree to this early on. For example, photos, videos or written feedback.
  4. Have different touch points to ask for feedback.
    You might want to ask about peoples’ experience of applying for funding in the grant confirmation email, and about how the activity or project went when the project ends.
  5. Visit the group in-person
    to see the project or activity in action and gather feedback.

We don’t want groups to simply [provide] evidence, but also share stories and use this as promotional material that would encourage other groups to apply for community grants.”
Roseworth Big Local partnership member

The insight and feedback that funded groups provide will help you assess whether the project is having the impact you’d hoped for and how the group is managing the grant. You could also review the programme as a whole to assess what has gone well or not so well; how community grants are helping you achieve the priorities in your plan; whether you need to make changes to the way you make your grants; or whether your community grants are helping the people you intended.

Questions to assess your monitoring and reporting process
Support with measuring change

Who wrote this toolkit

This toolkit has been written by Sonakshi Anand and Houda Davis from IVAR, based on work carried out by the authors with Eliza Buckley, Vita Terry and Surya Turner. It was edited by Charlotte Cassedanne and the Local Trust Communications team.

Thanks to the four Big Local partnerships, Hateley Cross, Kingsbrook and Cauldwell, Rastrick, and Roseworth, for participating in the original research and for sharing their experiences and ideas so openly. We would also like to thank Big Local partnerships Kirk Hallam, Radstock and Westfield and Whitley Bay who shared their experiences of community grants with us.

Additional support
Support for Big Local areas