When people want to make lasting change happen in their local community, they often need money to achieve their vision. Community grants can be used to fund new ideas or projects,
help establish groups and support activities that respond to community needs.
Sometimes known as community pots or community chests, community grants are relatively small amounts of money (often in the hundreds or thousands of pounds, rather than millions) that are distributed to local people to do great things. However, distributing money is harder than it sounds.
That’s why we’ve created this toolkit, to share tips and ideas on designing or refreshing a community grants programme. This toolkit can help you:
It’s based on an action research project carried out by the Institute for Voluntary Action Research (IVAR) with four Big Local partnerships – Hateley Cross, Kingsbrook and Cauldwell, Rastrick, and Roseworth. The research supported these four partnerships to improve their grant-making approaches and share their learnings.
The hardest part about grant-making is that there is never enough money to support the many good causes and projects we’d all love to deliver. So, it’s really important for your grants committee to set out why you want to give out community grants. Being specific will make it easier for you to make decisions and ensure you back projects that address local issues
Distributing community grants is a privilege and an opportunity to make lasting change in your local area. To have the most impact, it’s important to have a deep understanding of local needs; which organisations, projects or activities are already addressing them; and which groups will most benefit from your grants.
When you assess applications and award grants, you’re making judgements that balance risks and benefits. Community grants often fund new ideas or help establish new groups who may not have a track record. This could make them more likely to fail or encounter obstacles. But that doesn’t mean they’re not worth funding.
Indeed, community grants are often about more than just supporting activities and projects. They’re a way to build the confidence and skills of residents to deliver community activities and access further support and funding, as they did in Rastrick Big Local.
It can be overwhelming for residents to apply for funding and spend a grant as planned. That’s why providing some support to applicants and funded groups is essential to making community grants accessible to people who may never have applied for a grant or run a project before.
This could include:
This is an ex-coal mining community, so there are lots of community clubs and social clubs. Sometimes we use small grants to support these groups with business plans for larger projects, so they can make applications to bigger pots of funding.”
Big Local chair
Community grants programmes need simple and accessible processes to support residents to apply. Applications that require lots of information will take too much time to fill out and put people off, especially first-time applicants.
To streamline your application process, try to:
Sometimes conflicts and difficulties can arise when one group holds, and is responsible for distributing, funding. For example, some unsuccessful applicants may question decisions, especially if grants have been awarded to community members that are part of the grants committee. Making sure the way you make decisions is fair and transparent can help you avoid or navigate these types of problems if they arise.
Having an accessible application process is one step towards more transparent decision-making, but it could be helpful to look at how your organisation works. For example:
Measuring change or ‘monitoring and reporting’ helps you find out what is going well, what hasn’t gone as planned and how things could be improved. It’s important to balance what you need as a funder with what is realistic to expect of the groups and residents you want to fund.
Some useful approaches to collecting information and feedback include:
We don’t want groups to simply [provide] evidence, but also share stories and use this as promotional material that would encourage other groups to apply for community grants.”
Roseworth Big Local partnership member
The insight and feedback that funded groups provide will help you assess whether the project is having the impact you’d hoped for and how the group is managing the grant. You could also review the programme as a whole to assess what has gone well or not so well; how community grants are helping you achieve the priorities in your plan; whether you need to make changes to the way you make your grants; or whether your community grants are helping the people you intended.
This toolkit has been written by Sonakshi Anand and Houda Davis from IVAR, based on work carried out by the authors with Eliza Buckley, Vita Terry and Surya Turner. It was edited by Charlotte Cassedanne and the Local Trust Communications team.
Thanks to the four Big Local partnerships, Hateley Cross, Kingsbrook and Cauldwell, Rastrick, and Roseworth, for participating in the original research and for sharing their experiences and ideas so openly. We would also like to thank Big Local partnerships Kirk Hallam, Radstock and Westfield and Whitley Bay who shared their experiences of community grants with us.
Was this page helpful?
Thank you for your feedback!