Key insights from Local Trust roundtable held 3 November 2015 at the RSA
We hosted a roundtable debate at the RSA to explore the benefits and challenges of communities and public services working together. The event was attended by people involved in Big Local, academics, and voluntary and public sector professionals.
The debate provided insights into how collaboration can help create positive, lasting change for communities, where residents and local volunteers are encouraged and supported to take the lead and collaborate with public services; particularly with local authorities and commissioners as well as those who deliver services.
This is a summary of what we found out, and you can also download the full summary as a PDF.
It makes sense to create good working relationships between local authorities and communities. On-the-ground knowledge from communities can create better, more informed decision making. Expertise from local authorities can help community-led projects succeed. But to establish a meaningful two-way dialogue, adequate preparation needs to take place. It takes time to build trust and ensure everyone understands each other’s priorities.
Key insights:
For both public services and communities, there are barriers to collaboration including past negative experiences of working together. Communities can feel disempowered or be cynical about politics. Equally, some elected members and councillors or public service providers may have concerns about whether residents will work with them, and some might be uncomfortable about giving more say to unelected groups. More open-mindedness and trust is essential on both sides.
Key insights:
Reduced public spending makes relationships between residents and public services even more vital. Enterprising changes are taking place; some public services are being delivered in more innovative, collaborative ways. Some local authorities are going through radical change to deliver services with less funding, and are working in a more collaborative way with charities, communities and others. However, collaboration must be resourced so that people and organisations can work together to find solutions and permission needs to be given for it.
Key insights:
Collaboration works best where residents are more active, and we need to ensure a diverse section of residents are able to participate, rather than just the ‘vocal few’. Maybe it is the politically literate who get involved, or involvement only happens if a key service is challenged.
Key insights:
As a result of our debate we recommend:
1. Commit to the time it takes to establish collaboration.
2. Be open-minded to restore trust and confidence in each other.
3. Resource collaboration: it is a powerful solution in the current financial climate.
4. Help residents build their confidence and skills to improve their community.
5. Be patient – better to spend more time giving people what they want than to waste time, money and effort on what public service providers assume local people want.
Let us know what you think; what you have learnt; what works and what doesn’t. We’d be pleased to exchange blogs and speak at events together on this topic. Learning from each other, sharing stories of partnership working (successful and unsuccessful) will help create a more collaborative future for all communities and all public services. Contact us by email.
We also ran a survey to find out what local authorities and local volunteers think about collaborating together. We found a high level of support for collaboration, and learnt more about what helps it to succeed. View survey findings.
To explore some examples of collaboration in Big Local areas, click here.